Wegweiser Depression · Help & Rights Deutsch

⚖️ Depression and employment law

Dismissal during depression, duties of disclosure and protection against discrimination: the most important basic employment-law questions.

In brief

Depression alone does not automatically protect against dismissal – conversely, however, dismissal must not be given simply because someone is ill. What matters is whether and how severely the illness affects cooperation in the workplace in the long term, not the diagnosis itself.

Step by step

  1. Check the dismissal carefully (or have it checked)Check receipt, form and deadline of the dismissal; if in doubt, get legal advice promptly (employment lawyer, trade union, advice centre).
  2. File the unfair dismissal claim in timeIf you want to challenge a dismissal, the claim must reach the labour court within three weeks of receipt.
  3. Do not disclose the diagnosis unaskedIn principle you do not have to tell your employer that the incapacity for work is due to depression.
  4. Check the BEM offer and proportionalityIn case of dismissal due to illness, labour courts regularly examine whether milder means (e.g. BEM, continued employment in another position) were possible.
  5. Assert protection against discriminationIf depression is treated as an (assumed) disability within the meaning of the General Equal Treatment Act (AGG) and you are disadvantaged as a result, claims under the AGG may come into consideration.

Deadlines

3 weeks
Deadline for the unfair dismissal claim from receipt of the written dismissal§ 4 KSchG
2 months
Standard deadline for asserting claims for compensation/damages under the AGG in court, from knowledge of the discrimination§ 15 para. 4 AGG
Watch out – common mistakes
  • If the 3-week deadline for the unfair dismissal claim is missed, the dismissal is as a rule deemed valid – even if it would actually have been unlawful.
  • Not the diagnosis but the actual effects on ability to work are relevant under employment law – do not let yourself be pushed into revealing more details than necessary.
  • A dismissal "for illness" is demanding to justify under employment law (negative health prognosis, significant impairment of operations, weighing of interests) – blanket statements by the employer are not automatically enough.
  • With recognised severe disability, special protection against dismissal additionally applies, requiring the consent of the Integrationsamt (inclusion office) – see the separate topic page.
In depth · legal basis, figures and practice – for advisers and professionals

Dismissal due to illness

According to labour court case law, a dismissal due to illness is only valid if cumulatively there is a negative future prognosis regarding further illness, a resulting significant impairment of operational or economic interests, and an overall weighing of interests that is, in the end, unreasonable for the employer. A single, even longer, period of incapacity for work is generally not automatically enough for this.

Duties of disclosure

In principle there is no duty to tell the employer the diagnosis of an illness; medical confidentiality and personality rights protect this information. Exceptions may arise from safety-relevant activities in which fitness for work directly affects dangers to third parties.

Unfair dismissal claim

Anyone wishing to challenge a dismissal must bring a claim before the labour court within three weeks of receiving it (§ 4 KSchG); otherwise the dismissal is deemed valid from the outset under § 7 KSchG, regardless of its lawfulness in other respects.

General Equal Treatment Act (AGG)

A chronic mental illness can in an individual case count as a disability within the meaning of the AGG if it impairs participation in working life for an indefinite period. Discrimination on this ground can trigger claims for compensation or damages; claims must be asserted in writing within two months of knowledge of the discrimination.

Who is responsible
  • Labour court (Arbeitsgericht)
  • Employment lawyer
  • Integrationsamt (inclusion office, in case of severe disability)

Quick questions

Worum geht es bei „Depression and employment law“?
Dismissal during depression, duties of disclosure and protection against discrimination: the most important basic employment-law questions.
Which deadlines and figures matter?
  • 3 weeks: Deadline for the unfair dismissal claim from receipt of the written dismissal (§ 4 KSchG)
  • 2 months: Standard deadline for asserting claims for compensation/damages under the AGG in court, from knowledge of the discrimination (§ 15 para. 4 AGG)
What should I do first?
  • Check the dismissal carefully (or have it checked): Check receipt, form and deadline of the dismissal; if in doubt, get legal advice promptly (employment lawyer, trade union, advice centre).
  • File the unfair dismissal claim in time: If you want to challenge a dismissal, the claim must reach the labour court within three weeks of receipt.
  • Do not disclose the diagnosis unasked: In principle you do not have to tell your employer that the incapacity for work is due to depression.
What do I need to watch out for?
  • If the 3-week deadline for the unfair dismissal claim is missed, the dismissal is as a rule deemed valid – even if it would actually have been unlawful.
  • Not the diagnosis but the actual effects on ability to work are relevant under employment law – do not let yourself be pushed into revealing more details than necessary.
  • A dismissal "for illness" is demanding to justify under employment law (negative health prognosis, significant impairment of operations, weighing of interests) – blanket statements by the employer are not automatically enough.
Evidence
  • §§ 4, 7 KSchG (gesetze-im-internet.de)
  • § 15 AGG (gesetze-im-internet.de)
As of

As of: September 2026 (National Care Guideline/S3 guideline Unipolar Depression, version 3.0, 2025). · Sources and method

A question about your situation that this page does not answer? Write to us or use the contact form – we will tell you which office is responsible and what to bring. Free of charge, without individual legal advice.